Renault Clio 1.2 16v TCe GT
Model Year 2013 (Renault Clio IV), B - Segment (City car)

drivers'

4.6

rating

Badges:
hatchback
hatchback
x 5
x 5
Front
Front
1.2 L4 16v
Turbo
Turbo
Petrol
Petrol

Basic info on Renault Clio 1.2 16v TCe GT

The French car was first shown in year 2013 and powered by a 4 - cylinder turbo petrol unit, produced by Nissan. The engine offers a displacement of 1.2 litre matched to a front wheel drive system and a manual gearbox with 6 or a dual clutch gearbox with 6 gears. Vehicle in question is a city car with the top speed of 182km/h, reaching the 100km/h (62mph) mark in 9.0s and consuming around 5.3 liters of fuel every 100 kilometers.

Data

Engine info ( issues & breakdowns )
Nissan / Renault

1.2 TCe H5Ft 120

displacement:
1197
cc
configuration:
4 - Inline
 
valves:
16, 4 p/ cylinder
 
aspiration:
Turbo
 
fuel type:
Petrol
 
power:
120
hp
torque:
205
Nm
Vehicle information - Renault Clio
88% score
produced:
2013. - 2016.
 
body style:
hatchback
5 door
length:
4062
mm
width:
1732
mm
height:
1448
mm
boot:
443 - 1380
l
fuel tank:
45
l

Marketing

Performance

Manual gearbox performance

emission

B

category

manual gearbox

6 gears

average

5.3

l/100km

weight:
980
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
9.0
s
top speed:
182
km/h
cons. (urban):
6.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.3
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
118
g/km
Automatic gearbox performance

emission

C

category

dual clutch

6 gears

average

5.4

l/100km

weight:
980
kg
acc. 0-100 km/h:
8.6
s
top speed:
199
km/h
cons. (urban):
6.6
l/100km
cons. (highway):
4.4
l/100km
cons. (average):
5.4
l/100km
CO2 emissions:
120
g/km

Pros & Cons compared to direct rivals

safety
reliability
comfort
practicality
performance
economy
boot space

Safety results for Renault Clio

EuroNCAP: 88% occupant safety

Other cars that might interest you...

produced from 2012. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 88% score

acceleration

19%

slower

consumption

15%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

10%

larger

boot

55%

smaller

boot ext.

28%

smaller

price

4%

lower

produced from 2013. to 2016.  
EuroNCAP: 83% score

acceleration

6%

slower

consumption

13%

lower

power

9%

lower

length

3%

shorter

weight

6%

higher

fuel tank

10%

larger

boot

54%

smaller

boot ext.

23%

smaller

price

22%

lower

produced from 2012. to 2015.  
EuroNCAP: 82% score

acceleration

8%

slower

consumption

4%

lower

power

14%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

1%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

52%

smaller

boot ext.

63%

smaller

price

25%

lower

produced from 2014. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 89% score

acceleration

23%

slower

consumption

10%

lower

power

22%

lower

length

5%

shorter

weight

2%

higher

fuel tank

7%

smaller

boot

55%

smaller

boot ext.

61%

smaller

price

47%

higher

produced from 2015. to 2017.  
EuroNCAP: 82% score

acceleration

16%

slower

consumption

8%

lower

power

33%

lower

length

=

equal

weight

3%

higher

fuel tank

=

equal

boot

52%

smaller

boot ext.

63%

smaller

price

26%

higher

Check a car by its VIN number

Visitor comments



NOTE: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory. By sending a comment you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms & conditions.

No comments at this time. Be the first one to write a comment.

Ok, this is cool, now what

Follow us

AutoManiac Instagram

AutoManiac Facebook

AutoManiac database currently covers:

47worldwide automotive brands
1.565different vehicle models
2.275engines
14.080specific cars